The problem of the repetitious number

In this parlor trick you ask spectator A to write down any three-digit number, then to copy the number to a new piece of paper, followed by the same digits again, making a six-digit number. Without looking, instruct spectator A to pass the paper to spectator B without revealing the number to you.

Spectator B is to divide the resulting number by 7, and then pass the result to a spectator C, who divides the result by 11. (Tell them not to worry, there will be no remainder!)

Spectator C passes it to yet one final spectator. This last spectator is to divide the result by 13 and then read the resulting quotient. The result will be the original three-digit number.

Problem: Prove that this trick always works regardless of the initially-chosen number.

Hint: The key to solving this problem is finding a simple mathematical statement of it.


The key to this problem is that writing down a three-digit number and then making it into a six-digit number by appending the same three digits has the same effect as multiplying by 1,001.

So we can ask, is it true that 1001 * x / 7 / 11 / 13 = x?

Here is a solution built with Prooftoys.

The steps. A proof consists of a sequence of steps connected by inference rules, each producing a new step. In this proof we have:

  1. “Consider” – we start by “considering” the expression in the problem statement. Just under the hood, the full statement here is that 1001 * x / 7 / 11 / 13 = 1001 * x / 7 / 11 / 13, and this is true because anything is equal to itself. The full content of the step is a statement that the term is equal to itself. This step was created using the menu, selecting “consider”, and typing in 1001 * x / 7 / 11 / 13.

    Viewing the whole step. If you hover the mouse over the small blank space between the step number and the expression for this step, Prooftoys will display the entire step for you. In general, if you hover the mouse over this area, or an ellipsis (” … “) in this part of a step, Prooftoys will show you all of the parts of the step.

  2. “Simplify” – select the entire step by clicking on the checkbox. Then select “algebra: simplify” from the menu that pops up.

  3. “Standard form … “ – select the term 1001 * x / 1001, then pick the item “algebra: standard form for term in sum” from the menu that pops up.

  4. “Display fully” – This step does no inference, but causes the system to show all parts of its input step.

The display. Prooftoys often just displays an ellipsis (” … “) if part of a step is the same as in the previous step. If you hover the mouse cursor over the “ … “, Prooftoys displays the entire step without omissions. Or for step (1), hover over the blank space after the step number.

If you hover the mouse cursor over one of the step numbers, Prooftoys will highlight the part of the step that it worked on to get this one. If it worked on the whole step, it highlights just the number of the step it used as its input.

What about R x => … ? This means that if x is a (“real”) number, then the statement is true. The R is for “real”. Since we are working with numbers, you will see this often, and it just means you are working with numbers.

Try the steps yourself

Can you build the same proof yourself from just the given statement? Here is a workspace you can use to do the experiment.

Seeing details

Prooftoys encourages you to dig down into any step to see details for it. To see the next level of detail, click on the blue text in the description of the step, in this case the text starting with “standard form”. The display then expands vertically to show you another level of detail. Click on the same text again or on the box labeled “hide” to hide the details again. If there are many levels of detail you can repeat this process on steps in the detailed display.

If a step has the word “use” in its description, it means the step applies a rewrite rule.

Is there an easier way?

If you are good at math and rarely make mistakes as you work a problem, you probably find it easier to solve problems like this in your usual way, and then you don’t have to learn a new tool.

On the other hand, Prooftoys has a complete set of rules for reasoning, and it won’t goof if it gets a new kind of problem.

There is a quite different breed of computer tool for solving typical textbook math problems, and they are called “computer algebra systems”. With one of them you may be able to just enter a statement of the problem, and it will crank out the answer. For many kinds of problems they are much more capable than Prooftoys, but you will not learn nearly as much about proper mathematical reasoning by using one, and they are not built to work collaboratively with the human user as Prooftoys is.

What’s next?

The system and this website are both works in progress. More problems like this are on the way, so if you like what you see here, please –

Say, “Hello!”

If you are interested in using this website to work math problems or learn more about mathematical reasoning, the author is delighted to hear from you. Please check out the about page for ways to get in touch.

Challenge – Can you tell how long is a “lunar”?

This problem comes from the same book by Martin Gardner. He explains that in H. G. Wells’ novel, “The First Men in the Moon”, the moon is inhabited by intelligent natives who measure distance in lunars.

How long is a “lunar”?